Objective:
| · The objective of this assignment is to understand Database Administration, andDatabase Security. |
Plagiarism Policy:
| · This assignment is an individual task. Collaboration of any type amounts to aviolation of the academic integrity policy and will be reported to the AIO.· Content cannot be copied verbatim from any source(s). Please understand theconcept and write in your own words. In addition, cite the actual source. Failing todo so will be considered as plagiarism and/or cheating.· The Dalhousie Academic Integrity policy applies to all material submitted as part ofthis course. Please understand the policy, which is available at:https : //www. dal. ca/dept/university_s ecretariat/academi c-integrity.html |
Assignment Rubric
| Excellent (25%) | Proficient (15%) | Marginal (5%) | Unacceptable(0%) | |
| CompletenessincludingCitation | All required tasksare completed | Submission highlightstasks completion.However, missed sometasks in between, whichcreated a disconnection | Some tasks arecompleted, whichare disjoint innature. | Incorrect andirrelevant |
| Correctness | All parts of thegiven tasks arecorrect | Most of the given tasks arecorrect However, someportions need minormodifications | Most of the giventasks areincorrect. Thesubmissionrequires majormodifications. | Incorrect andunacceptable |
| Novelty | The submissioncontains novelcontribution in keysegments, which isa clear indication | The submission lacksnovel contributions. Thereare some evidences ofnovelty, however, it is notsignificant | The submissiondoes not containnovelcontributions.However, there is | There is nonovelty |
| of applicationknowledge | an evidence ofsome effort | |||
| Clarity | The written or | The written or graphical | The written or | Failed to prove |
| graphical | materials and developed | graphical | the clarity. Need | |
| materials, and | applications do not show | materials, and | proper | |
| developed | clear picture of the | developed | background | |
| applications | concept. There is room for | applications fail to | knowledge to | |
| provide a clearpicture of theconcept, andhighlights theclarity | improvement | prove the clarity.Backgroundknowledge isneeded | perform the tasks |
Citation:
McKinney, B. (2018). The impact of program-wide discussion board grading rubrics on students’ and faculty
satisfaction. Online Learning, 22(2), 289-299.
Tasks
- Read the given paper and write summary (Maximum 2 pages in your own words – Do
not copy any content verbatim).
- In addition, explore** and report, if the paper has any scope of improvements in terms
of technical details or concepts.
|
|
** Due to time constraint, and limitation of formal background research, you do not need to
explore any presented scientific equations or parameters in details
Visit and Login to https://dal.ca.libguides.com/ieee and search the following papers.
3 . Do not forget to provide citation in proper format for the given paper and for any other
supporting materials that you may use as reference.
Database Administration and Security Reading
H . Yais h and M . G oyal, ” Multi-tenant Database Access Control,” 2013 IEEE 16th International Conference
on Computational Science and Engineering, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2013, pp. 870-877, doi:
10.1109/CSE.2013.131.
Paper Link: https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.ezproxy.library.dal.ca/document/6755311
Assignment 5 Submission Format:
Submit one single P D F file
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.