, ,

[SOLVED] CS 6601 Assignment 3 Bayes Nets

30 $

SKU: 6456234346-1 Categories: , ,

## CS 6601 Assignment 3: Bayes Nets

In this assignment, you will work with probabilistic models known as Bayesian networks to efficiently calculate the answer to probability questions concerning discrete random variables.

### Resources

You will find the following resources helpful for this assignment.

*Canvas Videos:*
Lecture 5 on Probability
Lecture 6 on Bayes Nets

4th edition:
Chapter 12: Quantifying Uncertainty
Chapter 13: Probabilistic Reasoning

3rd edition:
Chapter 13: Quantifying Uncertainty
Chapter 14: Probabilistic Reasoning

[Markov Chain Monte Carlo](https://github.gatech.edu/omscs6601/assignment_3/blob/master/resources/LESSON1_Notes_MCMC.pdf)
[Gibbs Sampling](http://gandalf.psych.umn.edu/users/schrater/schrater_lab/courses/AI2/gibbs.pdf)
[Metropolis Hastings Sampling – 1](https://github.gatech.edu/omscs6601/assignment_3/blob/master/resources/mh%20sampling.pdf)

### Setup

1. Clone the project repository from Github

git clone https://github.gatech.edu/AI-Spring23/assignment3_.git

Substitute your actual username where the angle brackets are.

2. Navigate to `assignment_3/` directory

3. Activate the environment you created during Assignment 0

conda activate ai_env

In case you used a different environment name, to list of all environments you have on your machine you can run `conda env list`.

4. Run the following command in the command line to install and update the required packages

pip install torch===1.4.0 torchvision===0.5.0 -f https://download.pytorch.org/whl/torch_stable.html
pip install –upgrade -r requirements.txt

### Submission

Please include all of your own code for submission in `submission.py`.

**Important: There is a TOTAL submission limit of 5 on Gradescope for this assignment. This means you can submit a maximum of 5 times during the duration of the assignment. Please use your submissions carefully and do not submit until you have thoroughly tested your code locally.**

**If you’re at 4 submissions, use your fifth and last submission wisely. The submission marked as ‘Active’ in Gradescope will be the submission counted towards your grade.**

### Restrictions

You are not allowed to use following set of modules from ‘pgmpy’ Library.

>- pgmpy.sampling.*
>- pgmpy.factor.*
>- pgmpy.estimators.*

## Part 1 Bayesian network tutorial:

_[35 points total]_

To start, design a basic probabilistic model for the following system:

James Bond, Q (Quartermaster), and M (Head of MI6) are in charge of the security system at MI6, the Military Intelligence Unit of the British Secret Service. MI6 runs a special program called “Double-0”, where secret spy agents are trained and deployed to gather information concerning national security. A terrorist organization named “Spectre” is planning an espionage mission and its aim is to gain access to the secret “Double-0” files stored in the MI6 database. Q has designed a special security system to protect the secret “Double-0” files. In order to gain access to these files, Spectre needs to steal from MI6 a cipher and the key to crack this cipher. Q stores this cipher in his personal database, which is guarded by heavy security protocols. The key to cracking the cipher is known only to M, who is protected by Bond.

### 1a: Casting the net

_[10 points]_

Thus, Spectre can carry out their mission by performing the following steps:
>- Hire professional hackers who can write programs to launch a cyberattack on Q’s personal database.
>- Buy a state-of-the-art computer called “Contra” to actually launch this cyberattack.
>- Hire ruthless mercenaries to kidnap M and get access to the key.
>- Make sure Bond is not available with M at the time of the kidnapping.
>- Use the cipher and key to access the target “Double-0” files.

Sensing the imminent danger, MI6 has hired you to design a Bayes Network for modeling this espionage mission, so that it can be avoided. MI6 requires that you use the following name attributes for the nodes in your Bayes Network:
>- “H”: The event that Spectre hires professional hackers
>- “C”: The event that Spectre buys Contra
>- “M”: The event that Spectre hires mercenaries
>- “B”: The event that Bond is guarding M at the time of the kidnapping
>- “Q”: The event that Q’s database is hacked and the cipher is compromised
>- “K”: The event that M gets kidnapped and has to give away the key
>- “D”: The event that Spectre succeeds in obtaining the “Double-0” files

Based on their previous encounters with Spectre, MI6 has provided the following classified information that can help you design your Bayes Network:
>- Spectre will not be able to find and hire skilled professional hackers (call this false) with a probability of 0.5.
>- Spectre will get their hands on Contra (call this true) with a probability of 0.3.
>- Spectre will be unable to hire the mercenaries (call this false) with a probability of 0.2.
>- Since Bond is also assigned to another mission, the probability that he will be protecting M at a given moment (call this true) is just 0.5!
>- The professional hackers will be able to crack Q’s personal database (call this true) without using Contra with a probability of 0.55. However, if they get their hands on Contra, they can crack Q’s personal database with a probability of 0.9. In case Spectre can not hire these professional hackers, their less experienced employees will launch a cyberattack on Q’s personal database. In this case, Q’s database will remain secure with a probability of 0.75 if Spectre has Contra and with a probability of 0.95 if Spectre does not have Contra.
>- When Bond is protecting M, the probability that M stays safe (call this false) is 0.85 if mercenaries conduct the attack. Else, when mercenaries are not present, it the probability that M stays safe is as high as 0.99! However, if M is not accompanied by Bond, M gets kidnapped with a probability of 0.95 and 0.75 respectively, with and without the presence of mercenaries.
>- With both the cipher and the key, Spectre can access the “Double-0” files (call this true) with a probability of 0.99! If Spectre has none of these, then this probability drops down to 0.02! In case Spectre has just the cipher, the probability that the “Double-0” files remain uncompromised is 0.4. On the other hand, if Spectre has just the key, then this probability changes to 0.65.

Use the description of the model above to design a Bayesian network for this model. The `pgmpy` package is used to represent nodes and conditional probability arcs connecting nodes. Don’t worry about the probabilities for now. Use the functions below to create the net. You will write your code in `submission.py`.

Fill in the function `make_security_system_net()`

The following commands will create a BayesNet instance add node with name “node_name”:

BayesNet = BayesianModel()

You will use `BayesNet.add_edge()` to connect nodes. For example, to connect the parent and child nodes that you’ve already made (i.e. assuming that parent affects the child probability):

Use function `BayesNet.add_edge(,)`. For example:


After you have implemented `make_security_system_net()`, you can run the following test in the command line to make sure your network is set up correctly.

python probability_tests.py ProbabilityTests.test_network_setup

### 1b: Setting the probabilities

_[15 points]_

Now set the conditional probabilities for the necessary variables on the network you just built.

Fill in the function `set_probability()`

Using `pgmpy`’s `factors.discrete.TabularCPD` class: if you wanted to set the distribution for node ‘A’ with two possible values, where P(A) to 70% true, 30% false, you would invoke the following commands:

cpd_a = TabularCPD(‘A’, 2, values=[[0.3], [0.7]])

**NOTE: Use index 0 to represent FALSE and index 1 to represent TRUE, or you may run into testing issues.**

If you wanted to set the distribution for P(G|A) to be

| A |P(G=true given A)|
| —— | —– |
| T | 0.75|
| F | 0.85|

you would invoke:

cpd_ga = TabularCPD(‘G’, 2, values=[[0.15, 0.25], \
[ 0.85, 0.75]], evidence=[‘A’], evidence_card=[2])

**Reference** for the function: https://pgmpy.org/_modules/pgmpy/factors/discrete/CPD.html

Modeling a three-variable relationship is a bit trickier. If you wanted to set the following distribution for P(T|A,G) to be

| A | G |P(T=true given A and G)|
| — | — |:—-:|

you would invoke

cpd_tag = TabularCPD(‘T’, 2, values=[[0.9, 0.8, 0.4, 0.85], \
[0.1, 0.2, 0.6, 0.15]], evidence=[‘A’, ‘G’], evidence_card=[2, 2])

The key is to remember that first entry represents the probability for P(T==False), and second entry represents P(T==true).

Add Tabular conditional probability distributions to the bayesian model instance by using following command.

bayes_net.add_cpds(cpd_a, cpd_ga, cpd_tag)

You can check your probability distributions in the command line with

python probability_tests.py ProbabilityTests.test_probability_setup

### 1c: Probability calculations : Perform inference

_[10 points]_

To finish up, you’re going to perform inference on the network to calculate the following probabilities:

>- What is the marginal probability that the “Double-0” files get compromised?
>- You just received an update that the British Elite Forces have successfully secured and shut down Contra, making it unavailable for Spectre. Now, what is the conditional probability that the “Double-0” files get compromised?
>- Despite shutting down Contra, MI6 still believes that an attack is imminent. Thus, Bond is reassigned full-time to protect M. Given this new update and Contra still shut down, what is the conditional probability that the “Double-0” files get compromised?

You’ll fill out the “get_prob” functions to calculate the probabilities:
– `get_marginal_double0()`
– `get_conditional_double0_given_no_contra()`
– `get_conditional_double0_given_no_contra_and_bond_guarding()`

Here’s an example of how to do inference for the marginal probability of the “A” node being True (assuming `bayes_net` is your network):

solver = VariableElimination(bayes_net)
marginal_prob = solver.query(variables=[‘A’], joint=False)
prob = marginal_prob[‘A’].values

To compute the conditional probability, set the evidence variables before computing the marginal as seen below (here we’re computing P(‘A’ = false | ‘B’ = true, ‘C’ = False)):

solver = VariableElimination(bayes_net)
conditional_prob = solver.query(variables=[‘A’],evidence={‘B’:1,’C’:0}, joint=False)
prob = conditional_prob[‘A’].values

__NOTE__: `marginal_prob` and `conditional_prob` return two probabilities corresponding to `[False, True]` case. You must index into the correct position in `prob` to obtain the particular probability value you are looking for.

If you need to sanity-check to make sure you’re doing inference correctly, you can run inference on one of the probabilities that we gave you in 1a. For instance, running inference on P(M=false) should return 0.20 (i.e. 20%). However, due to imprecision in some machines it could appear as 0.199xx. You can also calculate the answers by hand to double-check.

## Part 2: Sampling

_[65 points total]_

For the main exercise, consider the following scenario.

There are three frisbee teams who play each other: the Airheads, the Buffoons, and the Clods (A, B and C for short).
Each match is between two teams, and each team can either win, lose, or draw in a match. Each team has a fixed but
unknown skill level, represented as an integer from 0 to 3. The outcome of each match is probabilistically proportional to the difference in skill level between the teams.

Sampling is a method for ESTIMATING a probability distribution when it is prohibitively expensive (even for inference!) to completely compute the distribution.

Here, we want to estimate the outcome of the matches, given prior knowledge of previous matches. Rather than using inference, we will do so by sampling the network using two [Markov Chain Monte Carlo](https://github.gatech.edu/omscs6601/assignment_3/blob/master/resources/LESSON1_Notes_MCMC.pdf) models: Gibbs sampling (2c) and Metropolis-Hastings (2d).

### 2a: Build the network.

_[10 points]_

For the first sub-part, consider a network with 3 teams : the Airheads, the Buffoons, and the Clods (A, B and C for short). 3 total matches are played.
Build a Bayes Net to represent the three teams and their influences on the match outcomes.

Fill in the function `get_game_network()`

Assume the following variable conventions:

| variable name | description|
|A| A’s skill level|
|B | B’s skill level|
|C | C’s skill level|
|AvB | the outcome of A vs. B
(0 = A wins, 1 = B wins, 2 = tie)|
|BvC | the outcome of B vs. C
(0 = B wins, 1 = C wins, 2 = tie)|
|CvA | the outcome of C vs. A
(0 = C wins, 1 = A wins, 2 = tie)|

Use the following name attributes:

>- “A”
>- “B”
>- “C”
>- “AvB”
>- “BvC”
>- “CvA”

Assume that each team has the following prior distribution of skill levels:

|skill level|P(skill level)|

In addition, assume that the differences in skill levels correspond to the following probabilities of winning:

| skill difference
(T2 – T1) | T1 wins | T2 wins| Tie |

You can check your network implementation in the command line with

python probability_tests.py ProbabilityTests.test_games_network

### 2b: Calculate posterior distribution for the 3rd match.

_[5 points]_

Suppose that you know the following outcome of two of the three games: A beats B and A draws with C. Calculate the posterior distribution for the outcome of the **BvC** match in `calculate_posterior()`.

Use the **VariableElimination** provided to perform inference.

You can check your posteriors in the command line with

python probability_tests.py ProbabilityTests.test_posterior

**NOTE: In the following sections, we’ll be arriving at the same values by using sampling.**

**NOTE: pgmpy’s VariableElimination may sometimes produce incorrect Posterior Probability distributions. While, it doesn’t have an impact on the Assignment, we discourage using it beyong the scope of this Assignment.**

#### Hints Regarding sampling for Part 2c, 2d, and 2e

*Hint 1:* In both Metropolis-Hastings and Gibbs sampling, you’ll need access to each node’s probability distribution and nodes.
You can access these by calling:

A_cpd = bayes_net.get_cpds(‘A’)
team_table = A_cpd.values
AvB_cpd = bayes_net.get_cpds(“AvB”)
match_table = AvB_cpd.values

*Hint 2:* While performing sampling, you will have to generate your initial sample by sampling uniformly at random an outcome for each non-evidence variable and by keeping the outcome of your evidence variables (`AvB` and `CvA`) fixed.

*Hint 3:* You’ll also want to use the random package, e.g. `random.randint()` or `random.choice()`, for the probabilistic choices that sampling makes.

*Hint 4:* In order to count the sample states later on, you’ll want to make sure the sample that you return is hashable. One way to do this is by returning the sample as a tuple.

### 2c: Gibbs sampling
_[15 points]_

Implement the Gibbs sampling algorithm, which is a special case of Metropolis-Hastings. You’ll do this in `Gibbs_sampler()`, which takes a Bayesian network and initial state value as a parameter and returns a sample state drawn from the network’s distribution. In case of Gibbs, the returned state differs from the input state at at-most one variable (randomly chosen).

The method should just consist of a single iteration of the algorithm. If an initial value is not given (initial state is None or and empty list), default to a state chosen uniformly at random from the possible states.

Note: **DO NOT USE the given inference engines or `pgmpy` samplers to run the sampling method**, since the whole point of sampling is to calculate marginals without running inference.


You may find [this](http://gandalf.psych.umn.edu/users/schrater/schrater_lab/courses/AI2/gibbs.pdf) helpful in understanding the basics of Gibbs sampling over Bayesian networks.

### 2d: Metropolis-Hastings sampling

_[15 points]_

Now you will implement the independent Metropolis-Hastings sampling algorithm in `MH_sampler()`, which is another method for estimating a probability distribution.
The general idea of MH is to build an approximation of a latent probability distribution by repeatedly generating a “candidate” value for each sample vector comprising of the random variables in the system, and then probabilistically accepting or rejecting the candidate value based on an underlying acceptance function. Unlike Gibbs, in case of MH, the returned state can differ from the initial state at more than one variable.
This [slide deck](https://github.gatech.edu/omscs6601/assignment_3/blob/master/resources/mh%20sampling.pdf) provides a nice intro.

This method should just perform a single iteration of the algorithm. If an initial value is not given, default to a state chosen uniformly at random from the possible states.

Note: **DO NOT USE the given inference engines to run the sampling method**, since the whole point of sampling is to calculate marginals without running inference.


### 2e: Comparing sampling methods

_[19 points]_

Now we are ready for the moment of truth.

Given the same outcomes as in 2b, A beats B and A draws with C, you should now estimate the likelihood of different outcomes for the third match by running Gibbs sampling until it converges to a stationary distribution.
We’ll say that the sampler has converged when, for “N” successive iterations, the difference in expected outcome for the 3rd match differs from the previous estimated outcome by less than “delta”. `N` is a positive integer, `delta` goes from `(0,1)`. For the most stationary convergence, `delta` should be very small. `N` could typically take values like 10,20,…,100 or even more.

Use the functions from 2c and 2d to measure how many iterations it takes for Gibbs and MH to converge to a stationary distribution over the posterior. See for yourself how close (or not) this stable distribution is to what the Inference Engine returned in 2b. And if not, try tuning those parameters(N and delta). (You might find the concept of “burn-in” period useful).

You can choose any N and delta (with the bounds above), as long as the convergence criterion is eventually met. For the purpose of this assignment, we’d recommend using a delta approximately equal to 0.001 and N at least as big as 10.

Repeat this experiment for Metropolis-Hastings sampling.

Fill in the function `compare_sampling()` to perform your experiments

Which algorithm converges more quickly? By approximately what factor? For instance, if Metropolis-Hastings takes twice as many iterations to converge as Gibbs sampling, you’d say that Gibbs converged faster by a factor of 2. Fill in `sampling_question()` to answer both parts.

### 2f: Return your name

_[1 point]_

A simple task to wind down the assignment. Return your name from the function aptly called `return_your_name()`.

Shopping Cart
[SOLVED] CS 6601 Assignment 3 Bayes Nets
30 $