[SOLVED] Secu0058 component 2 coursework p0

Brief
The purpose of this component is to make recommendations for introducing crime reduction measures in the shoplifting model developed in the module.
a) Describe the measures and their mechanisms in an Excel table. The data (i.e., verbatim quotes extracted from the paper : ) and synthesised information should be recorded in the table.
b) Indicate the situational crime prevention principle(s) involved in each security measure, e.g., increasing the effort… (Clarke, 1995 p.19, Cornish & Clarke, 2003, Clarke & Petrossian, 2010). Part 2 (2500 words max). In the next development phase of our shoplifting model, we would like to introduce a range of security measures. Draw on your review of the security measures in part 1 to explain and show how they could be modelled. Your answer should compriseEmail: two sections:
• Section A: Give an overview of SCP-based crime reduction elements relevant to shoplifting. Introduce the main approaches that can be used to model them.
• Section B: Select QQ: 749389476and implement one or two SCP-based security measures in NetLogo that could be introduced in the shoplifting model. Explain different modelling options in detail, discuss their advantages and disadvantages, show how you implemented it (or them) in the code, and show and analyse pertinent simulation resultshttps://tutorcs.com. You should include your developed code in an appendix; the code should have explanatory comments throughout.
Note: Draw on the data recorded in the Excel table to support your answer. Prioritise depth over breadth.
You must submit the table (Excel file), the report (Word doc) and the code (zipped file with all coding and supporting files – .csv, nls, .nlogo).
References
• Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. Crime prevention studies, 16, 4196.
• Clarke, R.V. & Petrossian. G. (2010) Shoplifting. 2nd Edition. Problem-Specific Guides Series. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police. No. 11
Marking criteria
This coursework is worth 70% of the module mark, with 30% allocated to Part 1 and 70% to Part 2.
Part 1 [30% of Component 2 mark]:
The mark for part 1 will be based on the quality and quantity of information in the Excel table. Particular attention will be given to the:
• structure of the Excel table (clarity, scope, relevance),
• information and supporting data (clarity, scope, accuracy, amount of details),
• presentation (style, typographic errors)
The Excel spreadsheet will not be considered in the word count.
Marking rubric
:
Structure of the Excel Table Table is poorly structured, unclear,
Assig
and lacks relevance. Table structure is somewhat clear but
nment Placks
cope and relevance to Lasky et al.
roject Exwith
minor issues in scope or clarity. Table is well-structured, highly relevant, and
am
Helporganise
d for easy understanding.
Informatio n and supporting data Lacks sufficient information and/or
Emai l
no supporting data from Lasky et al.
: tutorcs

sufficient clarity or detail; unclear synthesis of quotes. Adequate supporting data with sufficient
@163.coclarity
accurate synthesis of the quotes from the paper.
Comprehensive msupporting data,
highly relevant quotes and information synthesised effectively.
Presentation
(Style, typographic errors) Frequent
QQ:
typographical and formatting errors; poor style. 7493894Severa
l typographic
errors or formatting issues, but overall presentation is acceptable. 76Minimal typographic
d formatting errors, clear presentation style. Free of typographic errors, professionally presented with consistent style.

Part 2 [70% of Component 2 mark]:
The mark for part 2 will consider whether:
• the selected security measures are situational crime prevention measures,
• there is sufficient information to understand what these elements are and how they contribute to crime reduction,
• the presentation clearly explains how to model situational crime prevention principles in the shoplifting model,
• the answer contains accurate and pertinent arguments, including references to the literature and the findings from question 1,
• the general presentation is appropriate, considering the word count, style and structure, format of the references, typographic errors, etc.

Marking rubric
Selection of security measures Chosen security measures are not situational crime prevention (SCP) measures. SCP measures are identified, but
lack clear justification or explanation of relevance to shoplifting. SCP measures are mostly appropriate and welljustified, with links to shoplifting crime reduction. Selected SCP measures are
highly
appropriate, wellexplained, and clearly linked to shoplifting crime prevention.
Explanation of crime reduction elements Basic explanation of SCP crime reduction elements, but lacks depth or clarity.
Detailed explanation of relevant SCP crime reduction elements, mostly clear and accurate. Comprehensive, clear, and insightful explanation of SCP crime reduction elements.
Modelling SCP principles No clear explanation of how
SCP principles WeC
could be modelled. Some explanation of modelling SCP
hat:
cstutprinciples, but lacks
sufficient detail or clarity. Clear explanation of orcshow SCP
principles could be modelled, with relevant detail. Detailed, clear, and
comprehensive explanation of modelling SCP principles, with a strong understanding of how they work in practice.
Implementation of security measures in NetLogo Assig
No or poorly implemented security measures in NetLogo, with little or no Email

discussion of the code. nment P
Basic implementation in evaluation of NetLogo, but lacks or
:
tutorcs
detailed explanation different options. roject
ExClear implementation
of one or two SCPbased
ecurity
@163.cowith
dequate measures in NetLogo, discussion of modelling options. am
HelpHighly
detailed and insightful
implementation
in NetLogo, with
mdiscussion of
different
comprehensive
modelling options, advantages, and disadvantages.
Analysis of simulation results QQ:
No simulation results provided or results are irrelevant to the modelled security https: measures. 7493894Basic
ulation
results provided, but lacks indepth analysis or clear
//tutorcs.relevance
o the security measures implemented. 76Relevant simulation
sults are presented and analysed, with adequate
cominterpretation of

their impact on shoplifting crime reduction. Pertinent simulation results are thoroughly presented and analysed, offering clear insights into the
effectiveness and limitations of the
implemented security measures.
Code presentation and documentation No code or code is incomplete; lacks comments.
Code is present but lacks clarity and sufficient explanatory comments. Code is mostly complete with appropriate comments, but lacks some clarity or detail. Code is complete, wellorganised, and fully annotated with clear explanatory comments throughout.
Presentation and referencing Unclear presentation, lacking proper referencing or numerous typographic errors. Presentation is adequate but contains some typographic errors; inconsistent referencing. Clear presentation with minimal typographic errors; accurate and consistent referencing. Professional presentation with no typographic errors, consistently formatted references.