- (if you did not finish this last week) T : Rn Rm is a linear transformation.
- Is ker(T) a subspace of Rn?. Explain your reasoning. If yes, how can you find a basis for ker(T)?
- Is range(T) a subspace of Rm?. Explain your reasoning. If yes, how can you find a basis for range(T)?
(Hint: Connect ker(T) and range(T) to column space and nullspace of some matrix.) 2. A75 is matrix with 7 rows and 5 columns. The columns of A satisfy
(column-3) = 5(column-2) + (column-4).
Write down one concrete vector in N(A). Explain your reasoning.
- In class, we agreed that N(A), the set of all solutions to, is a vector subspace. What about all solutions to an inhomogeneous system? More precisely, given a fixed matrix Amn and fixed right hand side vector ~0 6=~b in Rm, define
V = {all solutions to A~x =~b}.
Is V a vector subspace of Rn?
- In class, we discussed to think of matrix multiplication as composition of functions. We thought about how, if you have (AB)~x, where A and B are matrices and ~x is a vector, (AB)~x = A(B~x) could be thought of as B transforming ~x first, and then A transforming the result of B~x.
This exercise reinforces that connection. (a) Given functions f and g below
f(x) = 2x + 4 g(x) = x2 3x
compute
- f(g(x)) and g(f(x))
- f(g(2)) and g(f(2))
(b) Let the matrices F and G be defined as below. Answer the following questions accordingly.
- Let , and let G~x = ~y. Compute G~x and compute F~y.
- Let ~x be the same vector as in i., and let F~x = ~u. Compute F~x and compute G~u.
- Compute FG and GF.
- Summarize, in words, the similarities between matrix multiplication and composition of functions. Point out the equivalence, in terms of compositions of functions f and g, of the various quantities in part (b): G~x, F~y, F~x, G~u, FG and GF. All notations have the same meaning as in parts (a) and (b).
- Is matrix multiplication commutative (That is, AB = BA for any matrices A and B)? Why or why not?
When we solved the Italicizing N Task 1 problem in class, some groups have written all the input vectors side by side into a matrix and all the output vectors the same way:
We used that as an example to introduce one interpretation of matrix multiplication-each column of the product matrix AB is the product of matrix A with the corresponding column vector of matrix B. Keep this interpretation in mind when answering following questions.
- In order for us to be able to multiply two matrices A and B together, what conditions do we have to put on the shapes of A and B? What is the shape of the product matrix AB?
- (a) Fill in the blanks and explain your reasoning: Each column vector of the product matrix AB is a linear combination of , and so each column vector of AB is in the span of
(b) As a consequence of part (a), what can you say about the relation among three column spaces C(AB), C(A), and C(B)?
- Assume that AB is defined. Determine the following statements true or false. If true, provide a justification. If false, provide a counterexample.
Hint: You may start by applying the definition of (in)dependence to columns of A or B and then try to multiply the equation by the other matrix.
- If the columns of B are linearly dependent, then so are the columns of AB.
- If the columns of A are linearly independent, then so are the columns of AB.
- True of false? If true, explain why. If false, provide a counterexample. A and B are matrices of appropriate shape so that each addition or multiplication is defined.
- If columns 1 and 3 of B are the same, so are columns 1 and 3 of AB.
- If AB and BA are defined then A and B are square.
- If AB and BA are defined then AB and BA are square.
- (AB)2 = A2B2. (e) (A + B)2 = A2 + 2AB + B2 (f) If AB = B then A = I.
- (Strang, 1.6, #25) Suppose that A is a 33 matrix with (Row-1)+(Row-2)=(Row-3).
- Explain why cannot have a solution.
- Which right-hand sides might allow a solution to A~x =~b?
- What happens to Row-3 if we perform forward elimination on A?
- Explain why each of the above three situations leads to the conclusion that A is not invertible? (Hint: Think in terms of the linear transformation LA that A )
- (Strang, 1.6, #40) True or False. If true, explain why. If false, show a concrete counterexample. (Hint: Use the fact that A is invertible if and only if the linear transformation LA which it defines is invertible.)
- A 44 matrix with a row of zeros is not invertible.
- A matrix with 1s down the main diagonal is invertible.
- If A is invertible, then A1 is invertible.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.