![[SOLVED] IFB202TC Enterprise Resource Planning 1st SEMESTER 2024/25 Python](https://assignmentchef.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/downloadzip.jpg)
IFB202TC
1st SEMESTER 2024/25 ASSESSED COURSEWORK
BSC INTELLIGENT SUPPLY CHAIN WITH CONTEMPORARY ENTREPRENEURIALISM
Enterprise Resource Planning
Individual Coursework
Deadline for submission: 11.59PM on 26 December 2024 (Beijing time).
IFB202TC Enterprise Resource Planning
Individual Coursework
Reflections are a critical way to make sense of what you are learning in class; it is how connections are created between topics, how you develop your views, how you link the classroom to your real-world experience, and how you develop your sense of learning.
Task: Working individually, prepare a written report that reflects your performance in ERPsim Manufacturing Extended Game played in this module by applying the concepts introduced throughout the course.
The following is an indicative list of some of the content you could incorporate into your report:
1. A short introduction that includes the objectives of the report, a description of how you have approached the task, and an overview of the structure of the report.
2. A short description of your role in the game and your overall strategy in this role.
3. An explanation of how and why you made your decisions at each step during the game, with detailed logs and records of decisions made during each game round.
4. Reflection and evaluation of your performance in the game: How did your decisions impact the company performance? What would you do differently if you were to play the game again? What was especially challenging in this game? What are the main takeaways from playing this game?
5. A discussion on how you think an ERP system could transform an organization, based on your experience in this module and playing the game.
6. A discussion on how studying this module has helped you as a supply chain manager.
Word count: No more than 2,500 words, excluding table of contents, abstract/executive summary (no more than 200 words), tables, figures, appendices and bibliography/list of references. No more than 20 pages, including table of contents, abstract/executive summary, tables, figures, appendices and bibliography/list of references. Marks will be deducted for work that exceeds the word count and page limit (see grading scheme below).
Preferred referencing method: Please ensure that the sources of all the information and data, and the analyses of others, are properly cited in your report using the Harvard method of referencing.
Indicative grading scheme:
— Structure and organization of report (including effective introduction and helpful use of headings and subheadings) – up to 5 marks.
— Presentation of report (including writing style and accuracy; effective use of grammar and
syntax; effective and accurate use of diagrams, tables, and illustrations; and length) – up to 5 marks.
— Use and application of relevant scholarly literature (including appropriate referencing, use of in
text citations and accurate presentation of bibliography/list of references) – up to 10 marks.
— Content of report:
Short introduction of the report – up to 5 marks.
Short description of your role – up to 5 marks.
Explanation of your decisions – up to 30 marks.
Evaluation of your performance – up to 20 marks.
Describe the role of the enterprise system in transforming an organization – up to 10 marks.
Discuss how studying this module has helped you as a supplier chain manager – up to 10 marks.
Performance Descriptors:
|
Grade |
Point Scale |
|
Criteria to be satisfied |
|
A |
81+ |
First |
Outstanding work that is at the upper limit of performance. Work would be worthy of dissemination under appropriate conditions. Mastery of advanced methods and techniques at a level beyond that explicitly taught. Ability to synthesise and employ in an original way idea from across the subject. In group work, there is evidence of an outstanding individual contribution. Excellent presentation. Outstanding command of critical analysis and judgment. |
|
B |
70 – 80 |
First |
Excellent range and depth of attainment of intended learning outcomes. Mastery of a wide range of methods and techniques. Evidence of study and originality clearly beyond the bounds of what has been taught. In group work, there is evidence of an excellent individual contribution. Excellent presentation. Able to display a command of critical thinking, analysis, and judgment. |
|
C |
60 – 69 |
Upper Second |
Attained all the intended learning outcomes for a module or assessment. Able to use well a range of methods and techniques to come to conclusions. Evidence of study, comprehension, and synthesis beyond the bounds of what has been explicitly taught. Very good presentation of material. Able to employ critical analysis and judgment. Where group work is involved there is evidence of a productive individual contribution |
|
D |
50- 59 |
Lower Second |
Some limitations in the attainment of learning objectives but has managed to grasp most of them. Able to use most of the methods and techniques taught. Evidence of study and comprehension of what has been taught Adequate presentation of material. Some grasp of issues and concepts underlying the techniques and material taught. Where group work is involved there is evidence of a positive individual contribution. |
|
E |
40 – 49 |
Third |
Limited attainment of intended learning outcomes. Able to use a proportion of the basic methods and techniques taught. Evidence of study and comprehension of what has been taught, but grasp insecure. Poorly presented. Some grasp of the issues and concepts underlying the techniques and material taught, but weak and incomplete. |
|
F |
0 – 39 |
Fail |
Attainment of only a minority of the learning outcomes. Able to demonstrate a clear but limited use of some of the basic methods and techniques taught. Weak and incomplete grasp of what has been taught. Deficient understanding of the issues and concepts underlying the techniques and material taught. Attainment of nearly all the intended learning outcomes deficient. Lack of ability to use at all or the right methods and techniques taught. Inadequately and incoherently presented. Wholly deficient grasp of what has been taught. Lack of understanding of the issues and concepts underlying the techniques and material taught. Incoherence in the presentation of information that hinders understanding. |
|
G |
0 |
Fail |
No significant assessable material, absent, or assessment missing a “must-pass” component. |
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.