[SOLVED] EFIM10014 Quantitative Analysis in Management COURSEWORK 2024 Java

Distinction (100-70)

Merit (69 – 60)

Pass (59 -50)

Pass (49 -40)

Fail (39 -0)

Pitch

Clarity and Engagement: The pitch is exceptionally clear, concise, and engaging.
Structure and Organization: The presentation is well-structured and logically organized, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.
Content and Relevance: Content is highly relevant, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the topic.
Delivery and Confidence: The presenters demonstrate high confidence,  and strong vocal delivery.

Clarity and Engagement: The pitch is clear and engaging, capturing the audience’s attention for most of the presentation.
Structure and Organization: The presentation is well-structured with a logical flow. The introduction, body, and conclusion are clear.
Content and Relevance: Content is relevant and demonstrates a good understanding of the topic.
Delivery and Confidence: The presenters show confidence.

Clarity and Engagement: The pitch is generally clear and engaging, capturing the audience’s attention for most parts.
Structure and Organization: The presentation has a clear structure, but some parts may lack logical flow or coherence.
Content and Relevance: Content is mostly relevant and shows a reasonable understanding of the topic. It generally aligns with the presentation objectives.
Delivery and Confidence: The presenters exhibit some confidence and adequate body language. Vocal delivery is satisfactory, with some eye contact and audience interaction.

Clarity and Engagement: The pitch lacks clarity.
Structure and Organization: The presentation structure is present but lacks coherence, with some parts poorly organized.
Content and Relevance: Content is somewhat relevant but may miss key points or lack depth. It only partially aligns with the presentation objectives.
Delivery and Confidence: The presenters show limited confidence.

Clarity and Engagement: The pitch is unclear.
Structure and Organization: The presentation lacks a clear structure and is poorly organized.
Content and Relevance: Content is irrelevant, superficial, or demonstrates a lack of understanding of the topic.
Delivery and Confidence: The presenters lack confidence.

Knowledge and Understanding

The student shows excellent understanding of the requirements of the assignment.                                 Recommendations made to the CEO are relevant and useful.
Recommendations for future research are also made.                           Student has shown extended analysis based on their own independent reading or has included information beyond the basic analysis (maybe even included relevant info from other weeks of QAM).

The student shows very good understanding of the requirements of the assignment. Relevant recommendations based on the findings are made to the CEO but might be rather basic.

The student shows good understanding of the requirements of the assignment.                                    Some recommendations are made to the CEO, but the student have made some confusing or irrelevant statements, or recommendations made are too basic.

The student shows a satisfactory understanding of the requirements of the assignment.  The recommendations made to the CEO are too brief or confusing.

The student shows poor understanding of the requirements of the assignment. They fail to demonstrate awareness of the proper analysis to predict what impacts sales.  Because the analysis is incorrect, the student fails to make proper recommendations to the CEO, or there is no attempt to make recommendations.

Analysis and Approach

The obtained/chosen model is statistically correct.
Student has shown and explained all steps involved in the analysis correctly.
Model validity is demonstrated fully and correctly.
All output is correctly interpreted.

The obtained/chosen model is statistically correct.
The student has shown and explained the steps involved in the analysis correctly but might have missed a minor explanation of one of the steps in the analysis.
Model validity is demonstrated fully and correctly.
The report might include some minor incomplete output interpretations.

The student might have missed an important step that affects the final model built, but a reasonable statistical analysis is demonstrated.
The final model has been validated but one of the assumptions might not be correct.
The output has been interpreted but there might be some other relevant interpretations missing.

They have run some analysis to find out what impacts sales, but they might not have conducted all relevant steps.
The student might not have conducted all the proper assumption testing.
Some output has been interpreted but other relevant interpretations and output are missing.

There is overall very little/inadequate statistical analysis and what is present is either incorrect or very confusing.
No interpretation or incorrect interpretation of output exists.

Organazaion and Strucutre

There is a clear division between the section for the CEO and that for the CFO.         The student differentiates between what explanation (and output interpretation) goes into the CEO report and what goes into the technical appendix for the CFO.               Good/correct writing style. of management and technical report with due regard to target audience for each part.

There is a clear division between the section for the CEO and that for the CFO.  The student attempts to differentiate between what explanation (and output interpretation) goes into the CEO report and what goes into the technical appendix for the CFO, but the presentation style/language used for the CEO might include a few technical terms.

There is a clear division between the section for the CEO and that for the CFO.          The language used for the CEO and CFO is almost the same (student has barely distinguished between the two audiences).

The report might not follow the recommended structure: CEO report followed by a technical appendix/section for the CFO and thus student has not distinguished between the two audiences.

The report is not follow the recommended structure: CEO report followed by a technical appendix/section for the CFO and thus student has not distinguished between the two audiences.

Ues of Source

References are included IF the student presents information outside the lecture material on Blackboard.

References are included IF the student presents information outside the lecture material on Blackboard.

References are included IF the student presents information outside the lecture material on Blackboard.

References are included IF the student presents information outside the lecture material on Blackboard.

References are included IF the student presents information outside the lecture material on Blackboard.

Style. and Presentation

The presentation is well-structured and includes appropriate sections.
Writing in PowerPoint is presented to a high standard and presentation of tables/graphs is neat and correct.

The presentation is well-structured and includes appropriate sections.
Writing in PowerPoint is presented to a high standard and presentation of tables/graphs is neat and correct

The essay might not be very well-structured. However, there is clear presentation of tables and figures.     Writing in PowerPoint is presented to a good standard and tables/grpahs are not in correct order.

The writing may lack fluency and contain errors in understanding and misinterpretation of concepts.
There is not a neat and clear presentation of tables and figures.

The report does not follow the recommended structure and has a weak or no discernible structure.
The writing in PowerPoint is poor which disrupts the understanding of the assignment.