In this project, you will design and implement a multi-threaded server that serves static files based on the GetFile protocol, which is a simple HTTP-like protocol. Alongside the server, you will also create a multi-threaded client that acts as a load generator for the server. Both the server and client will be written in C and be based on a sound, scalable design.

Please follow the instructions given in the environment repository for setting up your development/test environment.

You can clone the code in this repository with the command

$ git clone https://github.gatech.edu/gios-spr-25/pr1.git

We use an auto-grading system based upon Gradescope. You can find Gradescope from Canvas, and that will make the submission engine available to you. You will need to manually upload your code to Gradescope, where it will be executed in its own environment (a Docker container) and the results will be gathered up and returned to you.

Note that there is a strict limit to the amount of feedback that we can return to you. Thus:

• We do not return feedback for tests that pass
• We truncate any feedback past the limit (approximately 10KB)
• We do not return detailed feedback for tests that run after the 10KB limit is reached.

For this project, you may submit your code as many times as you wish for the Warmup exercises. For Parts 1 & 2 (each of which consists of a client and a server part) you will have a limit of no more than 50 submissions between now and the final due date; you may use them all within one day, or you may use one per day – the choice is yours.

We strongly encourage you to think about testing your own code. Test driven development is a standard technique for software, including systems software. The auto-grader is a grader and not a test suite.

Note: your project readme file (10% of your grade for Project 1) is submitted on Canvas in PDF format. The project readme file is limited to 12 pages. Please keep your project readme as short as possible while still covering the requirements of the assignment.

Gradescope includes an “activate” feature that purportedly tells you which version of your code you want us to grade; we do not use this feature. We always grade your last submission prior to the deadline. This is due to the nature of our assignments, which can have race conditions; allowing you to run the same code 10 times and pick the one that worked is antithetical to our learning objectives. Thus, we use your last submission. Plan accordingly.

Throughout the project, we encourage you to keep notes on what you have done, how you have approached each part of the project and what resources you used in preparing your work. We have provided you with a prototype file, readme-student-template.md that you may use as the basis for this report. You are not required to use this format.

In this project, your client and server will communicate via sockets. To help you familiarize yourself with C’s standard socket API, you will complete a few warm-up exercises

Most socket tutorials start with a client-server pair where the server simply echoes (that is, repeats back) the message that the client sends. Sometimes referred to as the EchoClient and the EchoServer. In the first part of this assignment, you will turn in a pair of programs that perform these roles.

For this first part of the assignment, we will make some simplifying assumptions. You may assume that neither the message to the server nor the response will be longer than 15 bytes. Thus, you may statically allocate memory (e.g. char buffer[16];) and then pass this memory address into send or recv. Because these messages are so short, you may assume that the full message is sent or received in every send or recv call. (If you may like, you may detect when this is not the case by looking at the return value and simply exiting if the full message is not sent or received). Neither your server nor your client should assume that the string response will be null-terminated, however.

It is important that the only output (either to stdout or stderr) be the response from the server. Any missing or additional output causes the test to fail.

Your echoserver should not terminate after sending its first response; rather, it should prepare to serve another request. You may consult the references suggested in this document or others on the internet.

Your programs should support both IPv4 and IPv6. We have tests in subsequent parts to test support for IPv4 and IPv6.

Once you have completed your programs inside the echo directory, you upload it to Gradescope (which you can find from Canvas).

Once submitted, Gradescope will test your echoclient.c code with its own reference implementation of echoserver.c and your echoserver.c code with its own reference implementation of echoclient.c. It will then return some feedback to help you refine your code if it does not meet requirements.

Note For this part of the assignment, you may submit your code as many times as you would like. Your grade is based upon the grade of your last submission.

In this part of the assignment, you will implement code to transfer files on a server to clients.

The basic mechanism is simple: when the client connects to the server, the server opens a pre-defined file (from the command line arguments), reads the contents from the file and writes them to the client via the socket (connection). When the server is done sending the file contents, the server closes the connection.

Because the network interface is a shared resource, the OS does not guarantee that calls to send will copy the contents of the full range of memory that is specified to the socket. Instead, (for non-blocking sockets) the OS may copy as much of the memory range as it can fit in the network buffer and then lets the caller know how much it copied via the return value.

int socket;
char *buffer
size_t length;
ssize_t sent;

/* Preparing message */
…

/*Sending message */
sent = send(socket, buffer, length, 0);

assert( sent == length); //WRONG!

You should not assume that sent has the same value as length. The function send may need to be called again (with different parameters) to ensure that the full message is sent.

Similarly, for recv, for TCP sockets, the OS does not wait for the range of memory specified to be completely filled with data from the network before the call returns. Instead, only a portion of the originally sent data may be delivered from the network to the memory address specified in a recv operation. The OS will let the caller know how much data it wrote via the return value of the recv call.

In several ways, this behavior is desirable, not only from the perspective of the operating system which must ensure that resources are properly shared, but also from the user’s perspective. For instance, the user may have no need to store in memory all of the data to be transferred. If the goal is to simply save data received over the network to disk, then this can be done a chunk at a time without having to store the whole file in memory.

In fact, it is this strategy that you should employ as the second part of the warm-up. You are to create a client, which simply connects to a server–no message need be sent– and saves the received data to a file on disk.

Beware of file permissions. Make sure to give yourself read and write access, e.g. S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR as the last parameter to open.

A sender of data may also want to use this approach of sending it a chunk at a time to conserve memory. Employ this strategy as you create a server that simply begins transferring data from a file over the network once it establishes a connection and closes the socket when finished.

Your server should not stop after a single transfer, but should continue accepting and transferring files to other clients. Your client should terminate after receiving the full contents. Unlike a normal web server (which leaves the socket open until the client closes it) your server should close the socket so the client knows when the full contents of the file have been transmitted. Note that the length of the file being sent is otherwise not known to the client; adding it to your client and server means it will not pass the grader because it does not implement the same protocol.

You may consult the references suggested in this document or others on the internet. Starter code is provided inside of the transfer directory. Once you have completed your programs inside this directory, you may upload it to Gradescope.

Getfile is a simple (HTTP-like) protocol used to transfer a file from one computer to another that we made up for this project. A typical successful transfer is illustrated below.

The general form of a request is

Note:

• The scheme is always GETFILE.
• The method is always GET.
• The path must always start with a ‘/’.

The general form of a response is

Note:

• The scheme is always GETFILE.
• The status must be in the set {‘OK’, ‘FILE_NOT_FOUND’, ‘ERROR’, ‘INVALID’}.
• INVALID is the appropriate status when the header is invalid. This includes a malformed header as well an incomplete header due to communication issues.
• FILE_NOT_FOUND is the appropriate response whenever the client has made an error in his request. ERROR is reserved for when the server is responsible for something bad happening.
• No content may be sent if the status is FILE_NOT_FOUND or ERROR.
• When the status is OK, the length should be a number expressed in ASCII (what sprintf will give you). The length parameter should be omitted for statuses of FILE_NOT_FOUND, INVALID, or ERROR.
• The character ‘\r’ is a single byte, which when used in a C literal string is translated by the compiler to be a carriage return.
• The character ‘\n’ is a single byte, which when used in a C literal string is translated by the compiler to be a newline character.
• The sequence ‘\r\n\r\n’ marks the end of the header. All remaining bytes are the files contents. This is four bytes of data.
• The space between the <scheme> and the <method> and the space between the <method> and the <path> are required. There should not be a space between the <path> and ‘\r\n\r\n’.
• The space between the <scheme> and the <status> and the space between the <status> and the <length> are required. There should not be a space betwen the <length> and ‘\r\n\r\n’. There should not be a space between <status> and ‘\r\n\r\n’.
• The length may be up to a 64 bit decimal unsigned value (that is, the value will be less than 18446744073709551616) though we do not require that you support this amount (nor will we test against a 16EB-1 byte file).

Note the strings are not terminated with a null character. The buffers that you receive are not C strings. Just like HTTP, this is a language neutral format. Do not assume that anything you receive is null (‘\0’) terminated. You should avoid using string functions unless you have ensured that the data has been null-terminated.

For Part 1 of the assignment you will implement a Getfile client library and a Getfile server library. The API and the descriptions of the individual functions can be found in the gfclient.h and gfserver.h header files. Your task is to implement these interfaces in the gfclient.c and gfserver.c files respectively. To help illustrate how the API is intended to be used and to help you test your code we have provided the other files necessary to build a simple Getfile server and workload generating client inside of the gflib directory. It contains the files

• Makefile – (do not modify) used for compiling the project components
• content.[ch] – (do not modify) a library that abstracts away the task of fetching content from disk.
• content.txt – (modify to help test) a data file for the content library
• gfclient.c – (modify and submit) implementation of the gfclient interface.
• gfclient.h – (do not modify) header file for the gfclient library
• gfclient-student.h – (modify and submit) header file for students to modify – submitted for client only
• gfclient_download.c – (modify to help test) the main file for the client workload generator. Illustrates use of gfclient library.
• gfserver.c – (modify and submit) implementation of the gfserver interface.
• gfserver.h – (do not modify) header file for the gfserver library.
• gfserver-student.h – (modify and submit) header file for students to modify – submitted for server only
• gfserver_main.c (modify to help test) the main file for the Getfile server. Illustrates the use of the gfserver library.
• gf-student.h (modify and submit) header file for students to modify – submitted for both client and server
• gf-student.c (modify and submit) implementation file for students to modify – submitted for both client and server
• handler.o – contains an implementation of the handler callback that is registered with the gfserver library.
• workload.[ch] – (do not modify) a library used by workload generator
• workload.txt – (modify to help test) a data file indicating what paths should be requested and where the results should be stored.

The client-side interface documented in gfclient.h is inspired by libcurl’s “easy” interface. To help illustrate how the API is intended to be used and to help you test your code, we have provided the file gfclient_download.c. For those not familiar with function pointers in C and callbacks, the interface can be confusing. The key idea is that before the user tells the gfclient library to perform a request, user should register one function to be called on the header (gfc_set_headerfunc) and register one function to be called for every “chunk” of the body (gfc_set_writefunc). That is, one call to the latter function will be made for every recv() call made by the gfclient library. (It so happens that none of the test code actually will use the header function, but please implement your library to support it anyway.)

The user of the gfclient library may want the callback functions to have access to data besides the information about the request provided by the gfclient library. For example, the write callback may need to know the file to which it should write the data. Thus, the user can register an argument that should be passed to the callback on every call. She or he does this with the gfc_set_headerarg and gfc_set_writearg functions. (Note that the user may have multiple requests being performed at once so a global variable is not suitable here.)

Note that the gfcrequest_t is used as an opaque pointer, meaning that it should be defined within the gfclient.c file and no user code (e.g. gfclient_download.c) should ever do anything with the object besides pass it to functions in the gfclient library.

The server side interface documented in gfserver.h is inspired by python’s built-in httpserver. The existing code in the file gfserver_main.c illustrates this usage. Again, for those not familiar with function pointers in C and callbacks, the interface can be confusing. The key idea is before starting up the server, the user registers a handler callback with gfserver library which controls how the request will be handled. The handler callback should not contain any of the socket-level code. Instead, it should use the gfs_sendheader, gfs_send, and potentially the gfs_abort functions provided by the gfserver library. Naturally, the gfserver library needs to know which request the handler is working on. All of this information is captured in the opaque pointer passed into the handler, which the handler must then pass back to the gfserver library when making these calls.

You should submit your code via Gradescope.

Note: For both the client and the server, your code should follow a boss-worker thread pattern. This will be graded. Also keep in mind this is a multi-threading exercise. You are NOT supposed to use fork() to spawn child processes, but instead you should be using the pthreads library to create/manage threads. You will have points removed if you don’t follow this instruction.

In Part 1, the Getfile server can only handle a single request at a time. To overcome this limitation, you will make your Getfile server multi-threaded by implementing your own version of the handler in handler.c and updating gfserver_main.c as needed. The main, i.e. boss, thread will continue listening to the socket and accepting new connection requests. New connections will, however, be fully handled by worker threads. The pool of worker threads should be initialized to the number of threads specified as a command line argument. You may need to add additional initialization or worker functions in handler.c. Use extern keyword to make functions from handler.c available to gfserver_main.c. For instance, the main file will need a way to set the number of threads.

Similarly on the client side, the Getfile workload generator can only download a single file at a time. In general for clients, when server latencies are large, this is a major disadvantage. You will make your client multithreaded by modifying gfclient_download.c. This will also make testing your getfile server easier.

In the client, a pool of worker threads should be initialized based on number of client worker threads specified with a command line argument. Once the worker threads have been started, the boss should enqueue the specified number of requests (from the command line argument) to them. They should continue to run. Once the boss confirms all requests have been completed, it should terminate the worker threads and exit. We will be looking for your code to use a work queue (from steque.[ch]), at least one mutex (pthread_mutex_t), and at least one condition variable (pthread_cond_t) to coordinate these activities. Gradescope will confirm that your implementation meets these requirements.

The folder mtgf includes both source and object files. The object files gfclient.o and gfserver.o may be used in-place of your own implementations. Source code is not provided because these files implement the protocol for Part 1. Note: these are the binary files used by Gradescope. They are known not to work on Ubuntu versions other than 20.04. They are 64 bit binaries (only). If you are working on other platforms, you should be able to use your protocol implementation files from Part 1.

• Makefile – (do not modify) used for compiling the project components
• content.[ch] – (do not modify) a library that abstracts away the task of fetching content from disk.
• content.txt – (modify to help test) a data file for the content library
• gfclient.o – (do not modify) implementation of the gfclient interface.
• gfclient.h – (do not modify) header file for the gfclient library
• gfclient-student.h – (modify and submit) header file for students to modify – submitted for client only
• gfclient_download.c – (modify and submit) the main file for the client workload generator. Illustrates use of gfclient library.
• gfserver.o – (do not modify) implementation of the gfserver interface.
• gfserver.h – (do not modify) header file for the gfserver library.
• gfserver-student.h – (modify and submit) header file for students to modify – submitted for server only
• gfserver_main.c (modify and submit) the main file for the Getfile server. Illustrates the use of the gfserver library.
• gf-student.h (modify and submit) header file for students to modify – submitted for both client and server
• gf-student.c (modify and submit) implementation file for students to modify – submitted for both client and server
• handler.c – (modify and submit) contains an implementation of the handler callback that is registered with the gfserver library.
• steque.[ch] – (do not modify) a library you must use for implementing your boss/worker queue.
• workload.[ch] – (do not modify) a library used by workload generator
• workload.txt – (modify to help test) a data file indicating what paths should be requested and where the results should be stored.

Your code should be submitted via Gradescope.

Throughout your development you should be keeping notes about what you are doing for your development. We encourage you to work on your your readme file as your project develops, so that it can serve as a log of your work.

To obtain all possible points, we want you to demonstrate your understanding of what you have done. We are not looking for a diary, we are looking for a clear explanation of what you did and why you did it. This is your grader’s opportunity to award you points for understanding the project, even if you struggle with the implementation, as these are manually graded.

NOTE: This is your opportunity to clearly document your reference materials.

Finally, we encourage you to make concrete suggestions on how you would improve this project. This is not required for the project, but is an opportunity for you to earn extra credit points. This could also include sample code, suggested tests (we really like examples!), ways to improve the documentation, etc.

You must submit:

• A file named yourgtaccount-analysis.pdf containing your writeup (GT account is what you log in with, not your all-digits ID. Example: jdoe1-analysis.pdf). This file will be submitted via Canvas as a PDF (Project 1 README assignment). You may use any tool you desire to create it, so long as it is a compliant PDF – and for us. Compliant means “we can open it using Acrobat Reader”.

The project readme is limited to 12 pages. Please keep your readme as short as possible while still covering all requirements of the assignment. Points will be deducted if the project readme exceeds the page limit.

NOTE: Some of the best readme files submitted are not long, but short, clear, and concise, including all requirements. This approach is particularly effective for a Georgia Tech graduate-level class, where clarity and conciseness are highly valued.

• Server and Client Example Code – note the link referenced from the readme does not work, but the sample code is valid.
• Another Tutorial with Source Code for server and client

• POSIX Threads (PThreads)
• Linux Sockets Tutorial
• Practical TCP/IP Sockets in C
• Guide to Network Programming

• High-level code design of multi-threaded GetFile server and client
• Return code (exit status) 11 of client or server means it received a SIGSEGV (segmentation fault). You can get a comprehensive list of signals with kill -l.
• In the warm-up part, the server should be running forever. It should not terminate after serving one request.
• Use the class VM to test and debug your code. The autograder is not a test harness.

• Warm-up (20 points)
  • Echo Client-Server (10 points)
  • Transfer (10 points)

Your submission should compile and build without any errors on gradescope.

For echo client-server: Your client program will be tested to make sure it correctly prints the message that was received from the server and your server will be tested to make sure it correctly echoes the message sent by the client. Note your submission may fail tests if it prints or echoes any additional characters (including formatting options such as newline characters.)

For transfer: Your client should successfully save the file sent from the sever on the disk and the server should accurately send the file to the client. File size and contents on the client should match the file size and contents on the server side.

• Part 1: Getfile Libraries (30 points)
  • Client (15 points)
  • Server(15 points)

Full credit requires: code compiles successfully, does not crash, files fully transmitted, basic safety checks (file present, end of file, etc.), and proper use of sockets – including the ability to restart your server implementation using the same port. Note that the automated tests will test some of these automatically, but graders may execute additional tests of these requirements.

Our tests include malformed requests such as invalid scheme (eg: PULLFILE), invalid method (eg: FETCH) and invalid path (eg: foo); requests for files that are not on the server as well as scenarios where the server is unable to process the client request. Likewise, our tests include valid requests that may result in a single message from the server (ie a single message with both the response header and data in the same message) or multiple messages from the server (response header or data sent in multiple messages, message size may or may not vary).

In addition to the above tests , we also run some sanity tests to ensure your submission compiles & builds without any errors on gradescope and proper initialization & cleanup is performed (eg: no memory leaks and no invalid memory accesses).

• Part 2: Multithreading (40 points)
  • Client (20 points)
  • Server(20 points)

Full credit requires: code compiles successfully, does not crash, does not deadlock, number of threads can be varied, concurrent execution of threads, files fully transmitted, correct use of locks to access shared state, no race conditions, etc. Note that the automated tests will test some of these automatically, but graders may execute additional tests of these requirements.

In addition to the sanity tests discussed in part 1, our tests will validate if your submission supports multiple file downloads of varying file sizes concurrently. Your implementation employs boss worker model to distribute work and uses appropriate synchronization mechanisms to protect shared data.

• README (10 points + 5 point extra credit opportunity)
  • Clearly demonstrates your understanding of what you did and why – we want to see your design and your explanation of the choices that you made and why you made those choices. (5 points)
  • A description of the flow of control for your code; we strongly suggest that you use graphics here, but a thorough textual explanation is sufficient. (2 points)
  • A brief explanation of how you tested your code. (2 points)
  • References any external materials that you consulted during your development process (1 point)
  • Suggestions on how you would improve the documentation, sample code, testing, or other aspects of the project (up to 5 points extra credit available for noteworthy suggestions here, e.g., actual descriptions of how you would change things, sample code, code for tests, etc.) We do not give extra credit for simply reporting an issue – we’re looking for actionable suggestions on how to improve things.

Partial Credit – some tests are run multiple times and credit is awarded for successul runs. This is the only partial credit we award. If your code did not work but you can explain why fully in your README file, we may give you full marks in the README.

In cases where we identify an issue with the grader that impacts your project, we may manually adjust the final scores. For example, if we find that your code fails to implement required functionality but the grader failed to detect this, we may reduce the score. Similarly, if we find an issue with the grader that failed to credit you properly, we may adjust the score manually. Normally this is done by running a modified version of the grader that is corrected. This is unusual, but has happened in the past..

Ideal README – the ideal README file is one that you could have picked up at the start of the project and used it to guide your development. It would explain the choices you considered and why you chose specific approaches to the problem. It won’t complain about the code, the process, how little you know about C, or other things unrelated to the project. It won’t discuss the code; it will discuss the techniques and algorithms.

Thus, a README file that explains the issues you faced, or provides an English description of your code, will receive at most half-points. A README file that explains what choices you faced, why you chose to implement it how you did, how you implemented it, and what your conclusions are about that choice can be awarded up to full marks.

For all questions, please use the class Piazza forum or Slack Workspace so that TAs and other students can assist you.