Microsoft Word EEET2349-Project Proposal Marking Form_2017.docx
EEET2349ProjectMarkingFormProjectProposal(25%ofthetotalmarkforthecourse)
ProjectTitle
1
:
Name: Supervisor
:
ID:
Assessmentcriteria Mark Comments
1. Suitability2
Markavailable Category
0 noshow
3
1 marginal
2 average
3 aboveaverage
4 excellent
2. Statementofthedesign/
researchproblem
4
Markavailable Category
0 noshow
1 vagueorsuperficial
2 clearlystated
3 clearlystatedandarticulated
3. Preliminaryliteraturereview5
Markavailable Category
0 noshow
1 marginal
2 acceptable
3 excellent
4. Designrequirements/
performancecriteria
Markavailable Category
0 noshow
1 vagueorsuperficial
2 clearlystated
3 clearlystatedandarticulated
5. Design/researchapproach/
methodology/plan
6
Markavailable Category
0 noshow
1 questionable
2 acceptable
3 wellthoughtout
6. Originality/novelty/innovation
Markavailable Category
0 noshow
1 maybe
2 yes
7. Clarityofpresentation
Markavailable Category
0 noshow
1 unclear
2 satisfactory
1
Projectstudentsdesign/researchprojectproposalismarkedbyacademicsupervisorintermsofitssuitabilityfor
anacademicassessmentofproponentsspecialisedknowledgeandskillsatAQF level9,andoriginality/novelty/
innovation[AQF13].
2
SuitabilityherereferstowhethertheproposalallowsassessmentofspecialisedknowledgeandskillsatAQFlevel9.
3
Noshowmeansthattheprojectstudentdoesnotattemptand/ortheworkpresentedisirrelevant.
4
Threecategoriesofengineeringdesignprojectsarecreativedesignleadingtonewandinnovativeproducts;variant
design to improve performance or to add new features to an existing system; and routine design usingwell
developedtheoryandpracticeforthedesign. Typesofengineeringdesignprojectmayvaryand includesystem
engineering and integration synthesizing subsystems into a larger system, experimental design to design
proceduresandapparatustodeterminecharactersofagivensystem,device,etc.,analysistoanalyseanexisting
system for improvement,and researchwhich isapplied researchbasedonexisting technologyand theory from
fundamentalresearchtodiscoverand/orcreateanewtechnology[FC08].
5
Literatureand technology review relevant toprojectwork includes fundamentalconcepts,principles, theories; in
depth specialised knowledge leading to the stateoftheart; benchmark technologies and engineering means; and
supportingevidence/materialsforproductrequirements/needs.
6
Themethodologyandapproachmaybedescribedusingmathematicalrepresentations,systemandorcomponent
leveldiagrams,statediagram,flowchart,statemachine,orphysicaldiagram,etc.,accompaniedbyafeasibleplan
(e.g.,usingGanttchart).
EEET2349ProjectMarkingFormProjectProposal(25%ofthetotalmarkforthecourse)
8. Qualityofreferences
Markavailable Category
0 noshow
1 Unrefereedorquestionable
2 refereedorstandard
3 refereed/uptodate/wellselected
9. Overallperformance
Markavailable Category
0 noshow
1 marginal
2 satisfactory
TotalMark
7
Supervisorsoverallcomments:
Supervisorssignature:
(notrequiredifsentbyemailfromRMITaddress)
Date:
ADDITIONALNOTES
AQFlevel9summaryandlearningoutcomescriteria[AQF13]
Summary Graduatesatthis levelwillhavespecialisedknowledgeandskillsforresearch,
and/orprofessionalpracticeand/orfurtherlearning.
Knowledge Graduatesat this levelwillhaveadvancedand integratedunderstandingofa
complexbodyofknowledgeinoneormoredisciplinesorareasofpractice.
Skills Graduatesatthislevelwillhaveexpert,specialisedcognitiveandtechnicalskills
inabodyofknowledgeorpracticetoindependently:
analysecritically,reflectonandsynthesisecomplex information,problems,
conceptsandtheories;
researchandapplyestablishedtheoriestoabodyofknowledgeorpractice;
interpret and transmit knowledge, skills and ideas to specialist and non
specialistaudiences.
Applicationof
knowledge
andskills
Graduates at this level will apply knowledge and skills to demonstrate
autonomy,expert judgement,adaptabilityand responsibilityasapractitioner
orlearner.
References:
[AQF13]AustralianQualificationsFrameworkCouncil,AustralianQualificationsFramework,2nded.,
Jan.2013.
[FC08] R.M.FordandC.S.Coulston,DesignforElectricalandComputerEngineers,Theory,
Concepts,andPractice,McGrawHill,2008.
7
Totalmarksavailableare25forthisassessment,andafullmarkof25correspondsto25%ofthefinalassessment
marksforthecourse.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.