•Evaluation Breakdown
No.
Component Title
Percentage (%)
•
Problems Analysis
10
•
UML Diagrams
20
•
•
•
TOTAL
APPENDIX 1
Marking Rubrics
Component Title
Percentage (%)
Criteria
Score and Descriptors
Weight (%)
Marks
Excellent
(25-30)
Good
(20-24)
Average
(15-19)
Need Improvement
(10-14)
Poor
(0-9)
Problems Analysis
Provide accurate and great details of the problems, with high clarity and readability. Ideas are properly structured and well presented.
Provide accurate and sufficient details of the problems. Ideas are properly structured.
Provide accurate materials, however with insufficient details.
Contain some correct and relevant material, some issues are neglected or are covered incorrectly.
Very little or nothing that is correct and relevant.
10
Criteria
Score and Descriptors
Excellent
(35-40)
Good
(30-34)
Average
(20-29)
Need Improvement
(10-19)
Poor
(0-9)
Weight (%)
Marks
UML
Diagrams
Consistent with the problems analysis.
Solutions are properly organized, with accurate and great details. Demonstrate some creativity in the analysis and design.
Consistent with the problems analysis. Solutions are properly organized and with sufficient details.
Provide accurate materials, however with insufficient details.
Contain some correct and relevant material, some issues are neglected or are covered incorrectly.
Very little or nothing that is correct and relevant.
20
TOTAL
30
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.